AVIF vs WebP: The Next-Gen Image Format Showdown
Analyze compression efficiency, browser compatibility, and visual quality differences between AVIF and WebP.
NA
Naushad Alam
Contributing Author · Squoosh Next BlogAVIF (AV1 Image File Format) represents the next frontier in web image compression, offering up to 50% file size savings compared to legacy JPEG and 20% compared to WebP. Developed by the Alliance for Open Media, AVIF leverages the AV1 video codec technology to store highly compressed raster images. In contrast, Google WebP remains highly compatible and faster to decode, making it an excellent fallback for older browser environments.
When deciding between the two, modern web applications should implement a dual-format approach: serve AVIF to supporting browsers via the picture element and include a WebP source as fallback. Both formats support transparency and animation, but AVIF offers superior grain preservation, making it the better choice for photographic content. For synthetic graphics and illustrations, WebP lossless still edges ahead due to faster decoding latency in current browser implementations.
Key Takeaways
AVIF (AV1 Image File Format) represents the next frontier in web image compression, offering up to 50% file size savings compared to legacy JPEG and 20% compared to WebP.
Developed by the Alliance for Open Media, AVIF leverages the AV1 video codec technology to store highly compressed raster images.
In contrast, Google WebP remains highly compatible and faster to decode, making it an excellent fallback for older browser environments.
When deciding between the two, modern web applications should implement a dual-format approach: serve AVIF to supporting browsers via the picture element and include a WebP source as fallback.
Try It in the Workspace
Everything discussed in this article can be tested directly in Squoosh Next — no sign-up, no upload, 100% client-side.